[bimdesigner]

For years, many of us in the construction and engineering industry worked with the BIM Level system, Level 0, Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3, as a guide to digital maturity and collaboration. These levels were closely tied to the PAS 1192 standards, which set the foundation for how we managed information and projects, especially in the UK.

However, in 2018, the industry took a major step forward with the introduction of the ISO 19650 series. This international standard replaced PAS 1192 and moved away from the rigid BIM Level structure. Instead of defining progress in steps, ISO 19650 focuses on continuous information management across the entire lifecycle of a project.

Here’s what makes ISO 19650 different:

It eliminates outdated terms like “BIM Level 2” and instead emphasizes a global, flexible approach to managing project data.

Greater focus on roles and responsibilities, so every stakeholder understands their part in creating and managing information.

A standardized process for naming, sharing, and approving information, making it easier to collaborate across teams and regions.

Concepts like Project Information Model (PIM) and Asset Information Model (AIM) that provide a structured way to handle project and operational data.

This shift impacts how many of us deliver Building Information Modelling Services, from modeling and coordination to long-term asset management. While some companies have smoothly adapted to the new standards, others are still finding it challenging to leave behind the BIM Levels mindset.
So, I’m curious to hear from other professionals:

-How has your team adapted to ISO 19650 in your day-to-day workflows?

-What challenges have you faced while moving away from the old BIM Level approach?

-Have you found any strategies or tools that helped make the transition smoother?

Let’s share experiences and insights — whether you’re deeply involved in BIM Modeling Services or just starting to align with the new framework. This could be a valuable discussion for everyone navigating this industry-wide change.

[silicongcc]

Great insights! 🌟 Moving from the traditional BIM Levels to ISO 19650 has been a real game-changer for our projects. Instead of ticking boxes for “Level 2,” we’re now focused on managing information continuously and ensuring everyone knows their responsibilities. The biggest hurdle was rethinking old habits, but using collaborative platforms and clear workflows made the shift smoother. It’s fascinating to see how structured models like PIM and AIM are now shaping both project delivery and long-term asset management. Curious how others are integrating these standards into daily workflows!

[silicon consultant Aus]

The statement is largely accurate, but the real shift under ISO 19650 is not the removal of BIM Levels—it is the change in focus. Maturity is no longer about claiming a level; it is about delivering the right information at the right time.

ISO 19650 replaces labels with accountability. Clear information requirements, defined roles, structured delivery plans, and controlled CDE workflows now drive how BIM is implemented. Success is measured by information quality, traceability, and usability, not by software or modeling depth.

Our adaptation has focused on aligning teams around information management processes rather than BIM “levels.” This approach delivers consistency across projects and aligns better with how ISO 19650 is intended to function in practice.

[Author]

Posts