When working on large-scale construction projects, determining the right Level of Development for MEP BIM Services becomes crucial for success. While many stakeholders assume LOD 300 is sufficient, complex infrastructure often demands higher precision.
At what point should we move beyond LOD 300 and adopt LOD 350 or even LOD 400 for MEP systems? For example, LOD 350 supports clear coordination between trades, which is essential in high-density utility zones. LOD 400, on the other hand, supports fabrication-ready models, which are vital for prefabrication and modular construction workflows.
Should the ideal LOD be determined solely by the project phase, or should client expectations, facility management goals, and trade complexity also guide the decision?
Let’s discuss:
What LOD levels are you using for MEP BIM in your current large-scale projects?
Have you experienced benefits (or challenges) when moving from LOD 300 to LOD 400?
How do you justify the cost and time involved in developing higher LOD models for MEP systems?
Are clients and contractors aligned on the value of higher-detail BIM models?
Looking forward to your real-world insights and best practices.
.
.