Motor Vehicles Act: Comparing the 1988 and 2019

This blog presents a comprehensive comparison between the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988 and its 2019 Amendment, exploring the need for reform.

The Motor Vehicles Act is the principal legislation governing road transport in India. Enacted originally in 1988, it aimed to regulate various aspects such as vehicle registration, licensing, traffic management, insurance, permits, and penalties. Over the years, the growing number of vehicles, increased road accidents, and changing transportation patterns demanded substantial reforms. In response, the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 was introduced.

Background: Why the Amendment Was Necessary

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, served well for its time. However, with India’s rapid urbanisation and motorisation, it became outdated in addressing several pressing issues, such as:

• High rate of road accidents and fatalities
• Corruption and inefficiencies in issuing licenses
• Minimal accountability for authorities and contractors
• Inadequate compensation for accident victims
• Absence of regulation for ride-hailing platforms
• Lack of provisions for technology-driven enforcement

Recognising these gaps, the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 introduced significant changes. The amendments focus on strengthening road safety, improving accountability, promoting digitisation, and enhancing public trust in traffic governance.

Key Differences Between the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the 2019 Amendment

1. Stricter Penalties for Traffic Violations

Under the 1988 Act, penalties were too low to deter violations. Fines remained unchanged for decades, making them ineffective.

Revised penalties under the 2019 Amendment:

The updated fines reflect the seriousness of violations and aim to reduce traffic violations through deterrence.

2. Compensation and Accident Claims

The 1988 Act had minimal provisions for road accident victims. Compensation amounts were low, and delays in claim settlements were common.

Key reforms in the 2019 Act:

• Provision for minimum compensation of ₹5 lakh in death cases
• Cashless treatment during the golden hour
• Faster settlement through the Motor Vehicle Accident Fund
• Simplified process under the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)

This victim-centric approach promotes timely assistance and justice to families affected by road accidents.

3. Licensing Process and Driver Training

Under the 1988 framework, it was possible to acquire a driving license without undergoing proper training or testing.

The 2019 Amendment emphasises:

• Accredited driver training centres for commercial drivers
• Use of automated driving test systems
• Integration of biometric authentication in issuing licenses
• Restrictions on learners’ licenses without proper documentation

This change aims to ensure that only trained individuals are permitted to drive, thereby reducing avoidable accidents.

4. Regulation of Aggregators

The 1988 Act had no provision to regulate online cab aggregators, as companies like Uber and Ola did not exist back then.

The 2019 Act introduced:

• Mandatory licensing of aggregators
• Clear safety and fair regulation framework
• Provisions to handle surge pricing and rider complaints

This brings such services within the legal framework and ensures accountability and consumer protection.

5. Protection of Good Samaritans

Previously, individuals helping accident victims faced legal risks and harassment, discouraging public assistance.

The 2019 Amendment offers:

• Legal protection for Good Samaritans
• No obligation to reveal identity or appear repeatedly in court
• Guidelines to protect them from police harassment or civil liability

This provision encourages bystanders to help accident victims without fear.

6. Vehicle Recall and Fitness Norms

The 1988 Act did not mandate fitness tests for all vehicle categories or recall of defective vehicles.

The 2019 reforms include:

• Provisions for mandatory recall of defective vehicles
• Automated fitness testing of commercial vehicles
• Penalties for manufacturers if defects lead to accidents

7. Digitisation and Traffic Enforcement

The earlier law relied heavily on manual systems, leading to inefficiencies and corruption.

Changes introduced in the 2019 Amendment:

• Integration of RTOs through the Vahan and Sarathi portals
• Acceptance of digital documents through DigiLocker
• Use of e-challans and surveillance-based enforcement
• Real-time access to vehicle and driver records

8. Accountability of Road Authorities

Under the 1988 Act, road contractors and government officials were rarely held accountable for poorly maintained roads.

The 2019 Act introduced:

• Civil liability for road contractors for faulty design or maintenance
• Accountability of RTO officials for malpractices in licensing
• Penalties for non-compliance with infrastructure safety norms

Conclusion

The Motor Vehicles Act has evolved significantly since its original enactment in 1988. The 2019 Amendment was not merely an update but a transformational shift in how road laws are perceived and enforced in India. It emphasises safety, accountability, digital governance, and public welfare. Though challenges remain in its uniform application, the law is a major step toward modern and responsible road management.

© 2024 Crivva - Business Promotion. All rights reserved.